User:Sjstephe/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Racial nationalism:
 * The citations need to be updated. There are not enough details. The content that is there is relevant and belongs. This article was written to inform about the concept of racial nationalism.  It seems neutral and unbiased. There are many viewpoints here that are not defined and therefor underrepresented. It only has one source which isn't the best but it is a good source, an academic source from a university press. The article is clear, easy to read and understand. There are no grammatical errors to my knowledge. There are no images which is a little visually unappealing. This article seems okay, its informative but not enough sources and not enough information. It seems a little incomplete. :
 * Turda, Marius; Weindling, Paul J., eds. (2007). Blood and Homeland: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Southeast Europe, 1900–1940 . Budapest: Central European University Press. ISBN 9789637326813
 * Racial nationalism:

Option 2

 * White Privilege Conference:
 * There are no citations or sources, only references. There are not enough details, like who attends these conferences? What has come out from these conferences? Where does the conference occur? Who leads the conference? Is it an all day affair or only a few hours? It seems unbiased, although I am questioning that media criticism section. It doesn't seem to be a 100% neutral standing point kinda sentence. The article is a little hard to follow, it seems like bullet points that were mushed into sentences. No grammatical errors except the listing in the first paragraph, its just too many commas I think. The article needs more details and doesn't seem complete. :
 * Sources, none:

Option 3
National alliance for autism research
 * This seems like a pretty solid article although again, it is too short and needs more details or information. There is only one reference which is a little meh, but there are also two external links. This article seems to come from a neutrel standing point. Its not hard to follow. There's no grammatical errors. Overall good article that just needs to be finished a little more
 * "Autism Speaks and the National Alliance for Autism Research complete merger" (Press release). Autism Speaks. 2006-02-13. Archived from the original on 21 November 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-21. :
 * "Autism Speaks and the National Alliance for Autism Research complete merger" (Press release). Autism Speaks. 2006-02-13. Archived from the original on 21 November 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-21. :