User:SkinnyTracy/Qiu Jin/Mian5 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username).  SkinnyTracy
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:SkinnyTracy/Qiu Jin

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead has introduced the background of Qiu, especially for the education background and then give the reason why she could be pioneer in the future, it is a great and new view i think.

Moreover, the introductory sentence is clear and concise.

The lead also includes the brief information about her achievements and big events, the content and the lead are matched fully.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
The content are great which was relevant to the topic and dived to the two main parts.

However there is no description about the current situations or comments. The content are careful and effective.

The article are not written related Wikipedia's equity gaps, also there is no underrepresented topics.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone is neutral and informed.The claims are argumentative but stand on the neutral ,the viewpoints are various and introduced Qiu's family life and study life.

The content does not have a obvious position tendency.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The secondary source are various and reliable, which are published on the famous academical universities publishers.

Most of them are published in recent years. The sources are focus on the female education, but also covers the Chinese revolutions.

The links are work successfully.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content 's structure are clear and easy to read, the main parts are easy to follow either.

The grammar and words' spelling are perfect.

Also, the content is well-organized with the topic sentence and controlling ideas in the two paragraphs.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
There is no image and media.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The content are well-organized and give the summary about Qiu's life for the article. i think it is a great work.

However maybe you should add more related books or examples to support Qiu's achievement in the following works.

Maybe, some famous comments from others are also useful.