User:Skmpark/Feminist language reform/Andreaplascencia Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Skmpark


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Skmpark/Feminist_language_reform?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Feminist language reform

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

From what I can see, my peer has not added to the lead, which in this case, I think is OK. As the article currently sits, it is concise without being overbearing and completely summarizing what the article will encompass. I believe my peer does a good job of providing some context as to the different fields that encompass this topic, especially intersecting areas of linguistics. Though the contributions are limited, from what I can see, it doesn't look like any of the additions are biased, maintaining the already present neutrality. It is also very easy to follow along and gain a general understanding of the article. My biggest piece of advice for my peer would be to include more information about the relevance of Spanish/French as it pertains to feminist language reform. Including a few more sentences on the developments in these sectors would really help the article, overall. Also, I would suggest being sure that the sources used to present new information are made clear in the bibliography.