User:Skomorokh/Future culture

The purpose of this project is to write an encyclopaedia. Yet it differs drastically from conventional encyclopaedia projects in the dynamism of editing, the relatively ahierarchical organisation, and the low barriers to participation. Which attitudes, norms and culture of interaction are conducive to the purpose under such circumstances?


 * Ideal norms: Professionalism, content-orientation


 * Caveats: Scalability and sustainability of norms


 * Dangerous norms: Frivolity, malice and power-hunger

Related essays

 * User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism