User:Skoodles/1992–1993 Jack in the Box E. coli outbreak/Cececason Peer Review

General info
I'm reviewing Skoodles additions to the 1992–1993 Jack in the Box E. coli outbreak article.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to the draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''

Yes, everything in the article seems relevant to helping me better understand the outbreak. No

''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?''

Yes, I believe that the article is mildly neutral regarding the information it is covering. The new article discusses the outbreak and how the media and official(s) responded to the claims of undercooked food coming from fast food restaurants like Jack in the Box.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The viewpoints I believe are equally represented as the article covers both the victim's and business's points of view during this.

''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?''

Yes, the links work and the source supports the claims made in the articles.

''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?''

Yes, each fact is supported by reliable references. The references come from the International Journal of Hospitality Management and Lessons Learned about protecting America’s food supply. The biases are noted as both of them acknowledge their purpose is to inform or analyze what happened.

''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? ''  As the reader the only thing I'd be interested in would reading more about lawsuits that were spurred out of this outbreak or lawsuits that used this case as an example to win other E. coli outbreak cases.