User:Skrtcobain/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Assam macaque

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I chose it because it was a C-class article on a cute-looking primate :) It especially matters because the conservation status pf the Assam macaque is rapidly shifting to being "threatened". My first impression was that the article seemed quite brief.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) The lead section is very much to the point. However, It does not include a quick description of every section. The content of the article is slightly dated, as its last edit was in 2016. Therefore, the article omits mention of recent research that proposes a species differentiation between two populations identified as one and the same species in wikipedia's article. As this is a very uncontroversial topic, the tone and balance are very neutral. As i mentioned before, the sources are incomplete ass they aren't up to date. The characteristics section reads very robotically and is somewhat grammatically incorrect (ie. "The facial skin is dark brownish to purplish." instead of "Their..."). The images are appropriate and the talk section is very unactive.