User:Skyhawk g650/Quantum cryptography/Aannulis Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Skyhawk g650
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Skyhawk g650/Quantum cryptography

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * no
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * no

Content evaluation
I think they did a good job of describing the advantages of quantum cryptography. I think they could put in a section about any disadvantages if there are any major ones.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Tone and balance evaluation
great job

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * yes they were diverse
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Sources and references evaluation
links are good and seem like reliable sources.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * yes their additions helped the article
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * I liked how they discussed the advantages of quantum cryptography and then discussed the differences between conditional and absolute security
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * they could add a section talking more about the disadvantages of qc and about how the encryptions can be broken

Overall evaluation
good job. there were some grammatical issues but overall it was a great job.