User:Slaro2025/Saurian Expedition of 1905/Vulpestooth Peer Review

General info
Slaro2025
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing User:Slaro2025/Saurian Expedition of 1905
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Saurian Expedition of 1905

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead was kept the same, but gives a good gist of what the rest of the article will be talking about. My only suggestion is maybe to expand a little bit on the important people you will be discussing. Perhaps you can integrate what the article's original lead was into yours?

I love the way you have your content formatted, it looks really neat and well done. The content added looks up to date, I assume its difficult to find very modern telling's of the expedition as it happened so long ago. The tone is neutral and talks about women, which are not hardly talked about in the paleontology field.

I did not notice any grammatical or spelling errors while reading, so all good there. I think there needs to be citation for the specimen that was found, because it is a very interesting point and someone may want to read more about it.

The images added are well captioned and relevant to the article. I really enjoy the image you included of the findings, it really fits the time period depictions of the animals found.

Overall the article is very well written. It was a very interesting read and informed me on women in the field that I had not known of before. Great job!