User:Sleepwhenyouredead/Strange Beasts of China/Crepting Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sleepwhenyouredead, AnnaliseD0d, JoshuaW25


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sleepwhenyouredead/Strange Beasts of China - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Strange Beasts of China - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The lead was concise and straight to the point. I feel that if contains all the relevant information to briefly sum up the entire article. The only thing (and I'm not sure if this is necessarily an issue or not) is that you mention the critical reception of your book in the lead, but this is not expounded on or mentioned anywhere else in the remainder of the article.

Content: While reading your article, I could not think of many areas where content was either lacking or was irrelevant. I would like to see some more information of the themes of the book if available, however, since it seems based off the rest of the article that your book is heavy in symbolism and allegory.

Tone and Balance: The tone throughout the article remains neutral and there are no instances of bias or any personal opinion. Good

Sources and References: I appreciate the abundance of sources used throughout the article. However, I noticed that the translation section has quite a few sentences with no reference, so you might want to add to that a little bit so that it is clearer that those are not your own words/thoughts. Additionally, I like how there is a hyperlink for every single mention of a topic/idea/person, etc. that has its own wiki page.

Organization: For the most part, the article looks well organized, and I think the order of the headings makes sense. I did notice however, that in the Beasts section, the organization/structure of the beast descriptions is a little discrepant. The first description of the sorrowful beasts is longer and more of a paragraph form while the rest of the descriptions are brief and straightforward. It feels a bit unbalanced.

Images and Media: No images or media on the page, but I also noticed that its harder to find uncopyrighted media for a newly translated book.

Overall: I think you guys have done a great job so far! The article not only flows well but is interesting to read without crossing over into a non-neutral tone.