User:Sma274/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Rose Glass

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose to evaluate this article because there is little information on the filmmaker Rose Glass and her contribution to the industry. Rose Glass has a very successful feature horror film but no information on her previous work and little information on the big projects she has in the future. There is not a lot of information when it comes to women filmmakers in horror and it is important to expand that. My first impression of this article is that it is a very brief summary of the highlights of her life without going into detail on her previous work, how she got started in the industry, or her early life.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like. )

The article contains all relevant information about Rose Glass' career and nothing felt like it was out of place or didn't belong. Because the filmmaker's career doesn't span back that far most of the information is up to date however, there could be updates made about her upcoming film because there is little information on that. The article represents her feature film Saint Maud, but under-represents her previous short films and how she got started in the industry. There could also be more information on her early life, since there isn't much prior her college career. The article contains no biased information and the claims are neutral. There are a few quotes from directors and others in the industry that are included in the article that could be seen as bias but that isn't being said by the editor so there is no bias coming from the contributors. The links for the citations work and are relevant to the article. There are a number of reliable sources including BAFTA and BFI. There is one source that is a review of her film Saint Maud which would be unreliable because there is bias in that source.