User:Smac98/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
AMPHORA

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Bioinformatics is my passion and want to learn more about free bioinformatics software so that I can be better prepared for the field.

Evaluate the article
Content is relevant however is 9 years old (2013). The GitHub has sufficient information but has not been updated in 3 years.The code works and works on bacterial and archaeal Sequences. The tone of the wikipedia page is neutral and very informative. The sources and references back the information on the page. There are no images displayed on the page. There is no conversations on the TALK page and is considered low importance on scale. The pages linked website is also down. Overall the wikipedia page is very informative to learn about the Github project. this article could be improved by testing new metagenomic datasets found on AmphoraNet.