User:Smalf002/Susan Folwell/Jesus DLT Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info
I am reviewing the work of Smalf002.

Jody Folwell

Lead evaluation
The Lead includes an introductory sentence that does concisely and clearly describes the article's topic, but it does not have a brief description of the article's major sections as there is a lack of information that could be considered major sections in the rest of the article. The Lead does also have information that is not present in the article with embedded links for certain terms. Overall the Lead is concise and not overly detailed.

Content evaluation
The content added is relevant to the topic as well as up-to-date. There does seem to be a very low amount of content so it is missing, but there is not content that does not belong.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content appears neutral as it is purely factual. There weren't any claims that appeared overly biased and there weren't viewpoints that were over represented or underrepresented. The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor any position over another.

Sources and references evaluation
All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information which are thorough and the sources are current. The links provided do work.

Organization evaluation
The content added is well-written and I did not see any grammatical or spelling errors. The content is well- organized into sections labeled for simplicity.

Images and media evaluation
There are no images on the article to enhance understanding of the topic so there is nothing to be labeled or properly cited to follow the Wikipedia copyright regulations.

New Article Evaluation
The article does meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements. The list of sources is not very exhaustive as there are very few listed. The article does follow the pattern of other similar articles like info boxes and section headings. The article does link to other articles so its more discoverable.

Overall evaluation
The content on the article overall could be improved simply by continuing to add more information than what is already added and an increase in sources to back the credibility of the information added.