User:SmallCheez

=Preforeword= Editor SmallCheez99 is a troll, not a sockpuppet. Apparently, they were mad that I listed Chris and Martin Kratt as the stars of Wild Kratts (which is not incorrect, FTR, they DO star in it) instead of the "presenters" like they wanted. Because I incensed them so, decided to get an account that resembled mine, apparently in an attempt to frame me for sockpuppetry. WP:NOR, of course, on my part. Any and all other editors with the name "SmallCheez" in some variation are sockpuppets, as my IP is not dynamic and thus sockpuppets would have the SAME IP, and I feel no need to create sockpuppets. I can get my point across just fine on my own.

Just to let you know. LOL, SmallCheez99. Also, you DO realize you spelled Chris' name wrong? Not to mention "...are the hosts are Wild...". If you'll look in the box to your right, you'll read where "Ethnicity" is listed as "English/Irish" and "Race" is listed as "Caucasian", so I'm not sure how you could have mistaken me for being a "n****r" as you liked to put it; so you can't even make racial slurs properly. Plus, if you're so brave, then why bleep it?

Wanna see, you guys?

=Foreword= Everything you need to know (and some things you didn't) is displayed in a helpful userbox! Just click "show" to reveal the userboxes and browse away! (For the things that didn't have a userbox [yeah, I'm gonna fix that!], they're listed in the infobox at right. XD)

Though it's annoying that I couldn't get the tables to go on the left side of the page. >_< Anybody know how to do that?

I know that some of the boxes in "Other Languages" could have gone in the "English" category, but they just didn't fit the tone of the section. Those are more styles of English than standard English, and they're not really "accents" either. So, for completely arbitrary reasons, they got put into the "Other Languages" section. XD

That's just how I roll. X3

If there's anything you need, I'd prefer it on the talk page (mainly because I'm less likely to see it here XD), if that's possible. Either way, I've got my own pages on my watchlist, and that's the first place I head when I come here (when not researching), so I'll see it, as long as it's on either one of my pages. =What Am I Doing Here?= Currently, I'm working on the Wild Kratts article exclusively. I've been trying to find a way to rewrite it to full Wikipedia standards (the problem right now is it sounds like a "press release" according to Wikipedia tags), but for now, I stick to editing minor errors (spelling, punctuation, etc), and reverting the too-oft non-standard addition. If I make a major edit to something of yours, and my edit explanation doesn't cut it, feel free to ask (in a civil way of course).

And before anyone DOES ask, the reason that the edit that "[Martin] seems to have feelings for Aviva" (and vice versa and all other versions of it) does not fit Wikipedia standards is that there is still no definitive proof, not by what Wikipedia considers proof WP:NOR. The points in the cartoon that are majorly considered proof by supporters is insufficient- all of the characters have done those things at one point or another. If it applies to two certain characters, then it applies to them all (well, except for Chris and Martin at obvious points). Example: If Martin high fives Aviva and that's considered proof, then it's proof of all the other characters' feelings for each other as well (in this case, this includes Chris and Martin because it's such a common action between people).

It's not a question of who's right or wrong, it's about whether or not the edit is up to Wikipedia standards. Mine wasn't either, and I wrote an entire section with about 3 or 4 subsections, so it's not like I'm editing out one sentence out of self-righteousness. In addition, the edit is non-standard because it is in fact biased. Newcomers to the page are not allowed the chance to watch the show and form their own opinion of the pairing WP:NPOV. Plus, the edit uses weasel words, which is another no-no. It often uses words like "seems" or "appear" in order to -weasel- (get it?) the reader into taking the statement as fact when it is unconfirmed WP:W2W.

In conclusion, even though the article isn't up to standards in the first place, the edit about the two's feelings throws the article off balance (in favor of Martin/Aviva without letting WK n00bs decide that for themselves), and just that one statement itself has more "standards" problems than the entire article. It has nothing to do with stance. If this explanation is still not sufficient, then you'll need to contact Jimbo Wales and have him edit the standards for you, because that's the best I can do WP:IDHT.

I'm almost ready to call WP:DE.

TL;DR
Currently, I'm working on the Wild Kratts article exclusively. I've been trying to find a way to rewrite it to full Wikipedia standards. For now, I stick to editing minor errors (spelling, punctuation, etc), and reverting the too-oft non-standard addition. If I make a major edit to something of yours, and my edit explanation doesn't cut it, feel free to ask (in a civil way of course).

And before anyone DOES ask, the reason that the edit that "[Martin] seems to have feelings for Aviva" (and vice versa and all other versions of it) does not fit Wikipedia standards is that:
 * There is still no definitive proof, not by what Wikipedia considers proof. WP:NOR
 * It is in fact biased. Newcomers to the page are not given the chance to watch the show and form their own opinion of the pairing. WP:NPOV
 * The edit uses weasel words, which is another no-no. WP:W2W
 * It often uses words like "seems" or "appear" in order to -weasel- (get it?) the reader into taking the statement as fact when it is unconfirmed.

In conclusion, it has nothing to do with stance. If this explanation is still not sufficient, then you'll need to contact Jimbo Wales and have him edit the standards for you, because that's the best I can do WP:IDHT.

I'm almost ready to call WP:DE.

=About This User=

And My Preferences
=Languages=

Other Languages
=Miscellany=