User:Smieczkowski/Donna Baird/Mbryan620 Peer Review

General info
Smieczkowski
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Donna Baird
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Donna Baird

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think this article is very well done. It is clear and concise and doesn't contain any unnecessary information. The content added is valuable and addressed a content gap, in my opinion. The content appears neutral and the tone is appropriate. The article is easily readable and interesting, but does not include irrelevant information-- which I think is a big strength. The sources appear to be reliable and the links work for me. I believe more sources could be added to enhance the article's reliability, but the ones present look accurate. The information presented in the article also accurately reflects the sources. Only one image is used, and it's of Baird. I believe that this is appropriate, it would be unnecessary to add other pictures to a biography unless relevant. The grammar of the article is correct, I don't see any issues there. The information is presented in a clear way and doesn't lack at all. I really like the layout of the sections of the article, it's clear and flows well. I specifically liked that Baird was chosen, as she has done research to benefit women. If anything were to be added, I would say some more detail about Baird's research could be beneficial to the understanding of her accomplishments and prominence. This article is written very well and looks great, I don't think much change needs to be done.