User:Smieczkowski/Kathryn Albers/Ekrodge Peer Review

General info
(smieckzkowski)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Kathryn Albers - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Kathryn Albers - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

I think the lead is very succinct and straightforward about who Kathyrn Albers is and why she is an article on Wikipedia.

Content:

The content is very relevant to Albers personal life and her education that got her to where she is in life right now. It is more focused on her early life and achievements rather than her research and other accolades.

Tone and Balance:

The tone is neutral and does not sway into opinionated statements. They did not attempt to sway the reader at all about Kathryn Albers.

Sources and References:

There were a good amount of selected publications that were added to the article. The references list is a little short but there are many links to other Wikipedia articles that help expand on the information that is given in the article.

Organization:

I think the organization flows very well, but a little more information about Albers research or career might make the article more well-rounded.

Overall Impressions:

I think this was a great, direct article that could only use some more information about Albers research instead of solely having early life information. The information that was added was much needed and filled in some gaps though.