User:Smilekud/Evaluate an Article

Article - Critical Race Theory

The lead section includes a good introductory sentence but is a little wordy in general. It includes the right information and isn't overly detailed. The content is related to a historically underrepresented group. The subsections are good, but there are missing citations and a disclaimer that the information is specific to the United States. Throughout the article, there are problems with the sources being too close or recent to the subject and missing citations. Other than this, there is extensive information available.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)