User:Smilestones

Dear Wikipedia and Reader;

Ordinary non-expert individuals, such as 'Smilestone', have serious bits of knowledge and life-encounters that need to be non-profitly & seriously shared i.e. published or forum'd.

Case #1: Topmost powers-that-be i.e. governments, academia, captains-of-industry, 'leaders', deliberately distort key-terms (Smilestone says 'wrongfully, immorally and malfeasantly'). Instance #1: Ethnic Persecution is deliberately required to be known, in English worldwide, as 'Ethnic Cleansing'.

Other published, constituted, legislated, regulatory wrongs, avoidances, and suppressions proliferate; and the individual person has a serious need to reject or shed such an imposition and adopt in its place an explicitly truthful term.

Since this latter is only possible through an adequate society or community, the like of which is not readily accessible even at first-world neighbourhood level, wikipedia-like or non-profit individual citizen's websites appear to be the only affordable ways of responsibly-reporting and joining-in-correcting such wrongs.

But it appears that Wikipedia has ruled that only established experts will be published; whilst many real-life ordinary readers find wrongful, questionable and even outrightly evil things in some such established-expert publications.

So where is the ordinary person to turn for participatory scrutiny and narrowing-down into Truth ? Where, and how, notify the worldwide public that an appropriately serious and non-profit citizen's website exists for such matters ?

Smilestone does not have big-money nor time nor speed-reading nor editorial-staff powers to help him encompass all that Wikipedia's legalistic small-prints are ruling.

And it can be further assumed that millions even billions of ordinary people worldwide are in this very same permanently low-income 'boat' and in daily fear of being 'sunk' by such warlord-like dictatorial powers-that-be.

Smilestone thought that one of the main intentions of Wikipedia is to enable the worldwide ordinary public to participate in nailing Lies and promoting Truth.

What is Wikipedia doing to ensure that the ordinary reader's submission, about such published wrongs or questionables, are non-authoritarianly considered and/or published as serious questions, observations and constructive-correction submissions, for the worldwide public to join with worldwide professionals in clearing up ?

What say you, please ?

Yours sincerely, "Smilestone". 1000bst Th 27 May 2010. Smilestones (talk) 10:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)