User:Smiley.Rileigh/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Actaea japonica - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article has minimal information regarding the species. It only briefly describes what it looks like and where it is typically located and does not have much, if any, information on topics such as taxonomy, possible uses, etc., though it is ranked as being somewhat important.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: The lead section is practically non-existent with very little information.

Content: Though the content in this article is relevant, it is severely lacking content as there is about one small paragraph of information on the entire page, which almost exclusively contains facts about where the plant is located and that it attracts pollinators.

Tone and Balance: The tone of the article is neutral; it is not debatable.

Sources and References: Not many sources were cited and the ones that were actually had more information than the wiki article does. There could also be better quality sources to site from.

Organization and Writing Quality: The writing is clear and easy to follow, however, there just in not much to follow.

Images and Media: The article does include two quality photos of the plant species.

Talk Page Discussion: There is absolutely nothing in the talk pages between previous editors.

Overall Impressions: This article is ranked as a stub-class with mid-importance. The article could be improved with better quality sources, more information in general because this article is quite underdeveloped.