User:Smithpf/sandbox

Kenneth Land believes that there is no structure for public criminology.

Article Evaluation

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * I believe that everything is relevant to the topic and I wasn't distracted by anything.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * The information in the article seemed to be up to date to me. Everything can be improved upon so I'm sure that there is more that cane be added.
 * What else could be improved?
 * The sections could be expanded with more information on public criminology to further help people understand the concept. Maybe add more benefits to PC.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * I believe that this article is neutral and that it is not biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Just adding more benefits to PC.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * I checked multiple citations and all of the links worked. The sources that I checked seem to support the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * There are some facts in the history section that don't have sources. I'm not sure where the information came from. The sources that I checked seemed to be neutral and I did not see any biases pointed out.
 * Talk Page
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Mostly productive conversations on how the page can be improved. There is one talk section on there where a reviewer is making statements that I do not agree with and cant see what they are trying to say.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article is not a featured article and is not a part of any WikiProjects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * It is more neutral and general . In class it felt more like we were being pushed towards PC which is not a bad thing as I can see the benefits to utilizing PC. I believe that in order to solve the problems in criminal justice the communities and people who are affected by crime need to be involved and this includes the criminals.