User:SmokeyJoe77/Biblical studies/Ammaclennan Peer Review

General info
SmokeyJoe77
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:SmokeyJoe77/Biblical studies
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Biblical studies

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

There is somewhat of a lead for this article-- a definition is provided with insight of the topic, however there is not much dive into explanation for the importance or relevance of the article. Not much was added to this section to strengthen the lead, however it does provide enough information to set up the rest of the information.

Content:

I appreciate the added section of theology and the definition provided. This could be more in depth of what theology does to contribute to biblical study in a way that is different from the other sections.

Tone and Balance:

This text is very neutral, both in the previously written parts of the article and the added parts. It is straightforward and to the point, which does not allow for too much interpretation but presents the information without obvious bias.

Sources and References:

Source links that were checked worked. Some good journals used as sources, however I am not sure what constitutes as credible in Biblical studies since it is almost entirely based off interpretation of various translations of the Biblical cannons.

Organization, Images and Media:

Organization was confusing as there are sections mentioned in the lead that are not present throughout the body. Would be insightful to have the comparative religion idea discussed further.

Overall Impression:

This includes a good skeleton of general knowledge for anyone with a brief curiosity of biblical studies. The sources could be utilized on their own for more extensive understanding of the topic.