User:SmoothE27/sandbox

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

- All of the information presented in the article appears to be relevant

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?'''

- All of the information presented in the article appears to be up-to-date

- The article provides a comprehensive overview of Moodie's life and historical contributions based on available information in other academic resources

What else could be improved?

- N/A

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

- The article presents information in an objective/neutral manner, and does not contain clear biases in support of, or against, Moodie

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

- N/A

'''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

- All of the citations work, and the sources support the claims made in the article without directly copying the text

'''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

- All of the sources cited in the article appear to be reputable, reliable sources

- No reference to DCB/DBC Mobile beta

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

- There is only one entry in the Talk Page, in which a Wikipedian added a link to a reputable source, strengthening the overall credibility of the article

'''How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?'''

- N/A

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

- Presents information in an objective manner relative to the secondary resource used to discuss Moodie in class, DCB/DBC Mobile beta