User:Snd244/Evaluate an Article

Evaluating the article "Wikipedia : WikiProject Primates"

 * I read the article "Wikipedia : WikiProject Primates" whose link is WikiProject Primates. I chose to look at the "Primates" WikiProject page because I am very interested in Primates.

Lead evaluation
The lead has a well produced statement that summarizes what the full article and its topics are about. It includes that name of all the article's major sections, however it does not include a brief description of these sections. The lead is short and concise and does not include information that is not relevant to the article itself.

Content evaluation
The content within the article all relates to primates and the evolution that corresponds with these mammals. All of the sections of the "Primates" article were edited very recently and are up to date. While all of the information within the article is relevant to primates and has a place in the article, there is more information on specific species of primates that could be added.

Tone and balance evaluation
The article is neutral and provides no biased statements. All the information stated within the article is well mentioned and not overstated or overused. The article is solely informational.

Sources and references evaluation
All of the sections within the article and information within the sections are followed by multiple references and external links. all of the sources and links are related to the topics explained. Because the article is about primates and their evolution/history, I find all of the sources reliable and current, even when written years ago. After checking multiple links within the sections, I found that all are reliable and work.

Organization evaluation
The article is well written and clear; providing information that is easy for anyone to read. The article has proper grammar and spelling. It is also broken into sections in order of history and is well organized.

Images and media evaluation
The article includes images that match the topic and further the readers' understanding of the article. The images are well captioned and to my knowledge adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. All images are well incorporated into the article and its topics.

Talk page evaluation
The main conversations taking place in the "talk" page were mainly people asking to edit specific topics within the article. This article is park of WikiProjects and "does not require a rating" according the the "talk" page. The people participating in the "talk" page are professional and respectful.

Overall evaluation
I think the article is quite good and has a status of being up-to-date, relevant and informational. The article explains the information included in a concise and easy to read way. While it includes a lot of good information, the article could include more information about all of the species of primates. I would say the article is medium-developed. This is because the information included is great and to the point, however there is a lot more information that could be added as well.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: