User:Sneiblum/Bala Chaudhary/Wikistu03 Peer Review

General info
Sneiblum, Ariannaberrios10, and Jgutierrez94
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bala Chaudhary

Evaluate the drafted changes
First, I have noticed that the "Lead" section of the article is incomplete. While it does provide a straightforward introductory sentence on the article's topic, it fails to describe the article's main sections, so I have no idea what I will be reading about when I scroll down. I would suggest summarizing the main points of the article body within the "Lead" section.

All content within the body is relevant to the topic at hand, and focuses on Wikipedia's equity gaps. All content is backed up by a source of information. The article is completely neutral in tone, and does not seem to over or underrepresent any particular issue. Your sources are reliable, relevant to the article's topic, and up to date. I love how diverse the sources are, not once did I see an author's name be repeated.

Overall, this article is very organized, clear, and concise. Everything is relevant to the topic, it has a variety of authors, is neutral in tone, and focuses on solving Wikipedia's equity gap.

Remember to fill out the "Lead" section of the article with key points from the article body such as: where the article topic previously worked, her accomplishments, etc. Though miniscule, you could also add any relevant pictures that you find to the article as well.