User:Snickerchip/Motown Records/Snickerchip Peer Review

General info
Amergoel and Sdlilly
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentina-Brasil_em_futebol&diff=67686706&oldid=67648443 :https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio(a):Sdlilly/Argentina-Brasil_em_futebol
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina-Brasil_em_futebol

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article is not entirely organized in a chronological order, but i still think it is organized well and in a somewhat sensible order. I think it would make more sense to be organized more chronologically, as it explains the history of the women's football rivalry between Argentina and Brazil. I also believe this version of the article reflects a more diverse perspective than was published in the Wikipedia article previously, and reflects some but not all of the perspectives in the published literature; I believe this due to the size of the subsection on the women's rivalry, and how short it is. I think this section of the article sort of tries to convince the reader to accept one point of view, such as when the following is written: "The achievements of the Brazil and Argentina women's teams are a testament to what can be achieved when barriers are overcome, and today, these teams inspire future generations of players across South America." From this, you can guess the perspective of the author by reading this section, given that this section doesn't feel neutral. Luckily, the subsection doesn't make claims on behalf of unnamed groups, or focus too much on certain positive or negative information. Also, most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, though many are also from news sources. Though the statements in this article are attributed to a variety of sources, there are still a couple unsourced statements in the subsection I was looking at.