User:SnowEm/Competence stimulating peptide/Weber.cdeyoung Peer Review

General info
Bdb.baker, Avaloowhoo, AndrewT21, KBMICR23, SnowEm
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:SnowEm/Competence stimulating peptide
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall I think y'all have a lot of good information and detail!

The one suggestion I would make is combining your Introduction and Lead paragraphs; or just adding more to the lead to give a more solid overview of the rest of the article. I think the introduction does that well, so I would just move it up and have your article body start with the background/discovery.