User:SnowyCinema/X

AVGN in LJN
−		 −	I believe there's no solid reason why AVGN cannot be mentioned in this article. He's been mentioned in a similar manner in the following similar articles: −		 −	−	−	−	−	−	−	−		 −	And many others. −		 −	Why doesn't the LJN article in particular get the same treatment? −		 −	'''To back it up, AVGN isn't just any critic. No. He's perhaps the most well-known video game critic in the history of video game criticism. Just read the article to see.''' −		 −	If you guys are gonna revert these edits, then I suggest to take it out of all articles mentioned above too. But you shouldn't, in my opinion. Because AVGN is VERY notable for what it does, which is video game criticism. Philmonte101 😊😄😞 (talk) 06:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC) −
 * Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (video game)
 * LJN Video Art (yes, a contraption made by this same company!)
 * Hong Kong 97
 * The Punisher (1990 video game)
 * Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing
 * Darkwing Duck (TurboGrafx-16)
 * Porky's (video game)
 * Before you delete any more similar content, I ask you discuss this with me and others, as AVGN is a quite notable critic indeed, and it would be strange not to mention him. I mean, some of these games are literally known by most people BECAUSE of a review by AVGN, one has to consider. Philmonte101 😊😄😞 (talk) 06:37, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

−
 * Just because you don't like something that someone said doesn't mean you shouldn't take it seriously. Reverting for no clear reason whatsoever, no explanation? I quote, from WP:Discussion (since Wikipedians seem to love to use the WP:X stuff): "If someone queries one of your edits, make sure you reply with a full, helpful rationale." Clearly I disagree, and am seeking a compromise of sorts or at least an explanation. Therefore, please at least explain fully or discuss. Though, to be fair, I should've been nicer too, so I touched up the comments a bit. Philmonte101 😊😄😞 (talk) 07:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)