User:Snqadri/Bulimia nervosa/Emiell490 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Snqadri


 * Link to draft you're reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Snqadri/Bulimia_nervosa?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Bulimia nervosa

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

- In the first sentence, consider adding a link to purging so that readers will be able to learn what it is if they do not know already.

- The first paragraph's ending sentence feels random. Consider either deleting it or creating another paragraph for it where it relates

- The last two paragraphs do not feel as if they belong in the lead. The next to last paragraph may fit better with a treatment section, and the last may fit better in a history or statistics/diagnosis section.

- Other than that, the lead has a nice and clear introduction to bulimia.

Content

- Catching the DSM-V as updated criteria was a great catch. It is very important for people to understand that the new DSM is the followed criteria.

- Consider worrying less about citations and more about the accuracy of the content and clear wording/organization of the content.

- Most of the content in the article relates to the topic and is straightforward and informative.

Tone and Balance

- All information is neutral and does not lean towards a certain side.

Sources and References

- As you pointed out, some citations/reference corrections are needed. Links work correctly for the ones already listed.

Organization

- Organization of this article is clear and easy to navigate. I do not see a need to consider any major reorganization aside from what has been previously mentioned.

Overall

- This article is a clear one with a lot of helpful information. It seems there only needs to be a few tweaks to make it a great article from what I see out of your edits.