User:Sns229/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Clinical physiology
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I feel as though I will have some knowledge in the area.

Lead evaluation
"Introductory is concise and describes the topics article. There is a brief description with the articles major topics. the article is too the point and does not include too much information"

Content evaluation
All of the content is relevant, although the information could be more up to date.

Tone and balance evaluation
"The article is imaging. No information seem biased or overpresented."

Sources and references evaluation
"Not all of the links available in the sources are still working. the citation 3 is also not a peer reviewed citation."

Organization evaluation
"The article is well written."

Images and media evaluation
"No images are present in this article."

Talk page evaluation
"There are conversations as to where some of the information the article has and where it is from. The conversation is pushing for more/better references. This project is a part of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment."

Overall evaluation
"This article is good at being concise, but lacks enough research and references. I would say that this article was poorly developed."

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Clinical_physiology&action=edit