User:SocksTheKitty/User:Jagerismydogsname7151/Spillover infection/SocksTheKitty Peer Review

General info
Jagerismydogsname7151
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jagerismydogsname7151/Spillover_infection?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Spillover infection

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Same as original article so no comment

Content

The new addition is relevant to the content of the preexisting article. It feels like it fits in and not disjointed like it can sometimes feel with multiple authors. It is a little bit difficult to understand the first time that you read it if you are not a biologist but after reading it a second time it makes sense. I do not think that it needs to be changed but it could be a good idea so its easier for people to understand who may not know as much biology.

Tone and Balance

The addition is neutral and does not try to prove a point or to convince the reader of anything.

Sources and References

There are less sources than the original article but some of them appear to be different which shows that there was a lot of research done. The articles appear to be reputable and there are many academic articles so I see no issue here.

Organization

Mostly same as original article so no comments on organization. The place where the new content was added makes sense.

Images and Media

N/A

Overall ImpressionsThere was not a ton added to the article but the addition is well thought out and has many references included. It may not be a lot of writing but there is clearly a lot of thought and time that was put into that paragraph. Overall the addition to the article is very good and it adds important information to the article that was missing before. It is a definite improvement to the preexisting article.