User:Sofiacvitale02/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Water supply

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Water supply is very important and is extremely related to SDG 6. This article is matters as it gives context and more details about water supply around the globe. The article had helpful information and was relatively up to date. This article is helpful in giving an overview of water supply in terms of history and general information. I do not feel that the article is very organized, and it is not structured in a way that is easy to read.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article includes an introductory sentence that gives a clear definition of the topic. It does not really mention brief descriptions of the major sections. I think the lead is too detailed, and not the best introduction to the article. Most of the content is relevant to the topic. However, there were a few subtopics that were distracting and that could be removed. The references were relatively up to date, and it was edited recently. However, more references can be added and improved. Also, there should be a section on specifically underrepresented populations. The article seems relatively neutral, but there are some claims that can be worded with less opinion. The article contains images, but there are still more that can be added to enhance the overall experience of reading the article. Overall, I though the article can be improved majorly in organization, references, and overall structure.