User:Sofiareboredo/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Argentine literature

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I believe that Argentinian literature and it's history is very interesting. My first impression of this article was that it is very complete and clear, including a lot of information form past and present.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article I chose gives a clear introduction about the topic that is going to be talked about. It mentions important people and subjects that are going to be further developed throughout the article, so the readers have a good idea about what they're going to be reading. It is a concise lead, that includes not too much information, but just enough. The content in the article include a bit of everything, from history of the country itself, to history of its literature and authors. Most of the information in this article is relevant to the topic, except maybe when it talks more about the country itself that its literature and authors, since that's what the article is about. Nevertheless, I don't think that information is completely useless. It helps add more background to the main topic the article is talking about. The content in the article is up-to-date, but I would add some more information about Argentinian literature nowadays. Most of the article talks about the history of Argentinian literature and about the past, but I think talking about the present and more modern literature is equally relevant. The tone of the article is pretty neutral, just focusing on giving the information and not giving opinions or make it seem like its biased in any sense. The sources used in this article are reliable, being mostly history pages. They're not current sources, most of them are from a couple of years ago. I would include some information from some current sources as well in order to make this article more reliable. There are some better sources available, like history books for example. All of the links listed on the article work. The articles is well organized, divided into clear sections, but some parts are a bit too much to take in. I would not change the sections the article is divided into, but I would change how those sections are written. The article does include well captioned images but they don't really contribute to the understanding of the topic. It could include more relevant pictures that help better understand the topic. (he talk page conversations are mostly about how some information is not well organized and some missing information. I agree with both of this statements.

Overall, this is an ok article, giving the expected information and providing reliable sources. It has potential to be a good or even great article with the modification of a couple of things, such as the organization of some areas of the article, the type of information included, the pictures used, and the sources.