User:Softstarkid/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Riepl's law

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It looked cool and also relevant as technology is further expanding every year and people fear the replacement of what they know.

Evaluate the article
First sentence is pretty explanatory considering the article is barely longer than two paragraphs. It's definitely concise.

I think the article is relevant but it's not exactly up-to-date. There needs to be a citation after the very first sentence claiming the hypothesis made by Wolfgang Riepl. None of the citations are more recent than 2006 so that's definitely a bummer.

The text reads very neutral all things considered.

The information in the article is all backed up by apt sources, but it's all very outdated and they're cited incorrectly. All the links work and lead to their respective sites. There's not a variety of references, but I don't blame who wrote this article because it's a pretty niche subtopic. There's a citation after the big paragraph that doesn't need to be there and on top of that it's incorrectly cited.

It's organized fine, but the biggest paragraph just feels like a big run-on sentence and it could be organized better to show the five principles of matrices of media.

no images or media.

no talk page discussion. categorized as a stub page and needs lots more info and proper citations.

i think this is a decent article for something that hasn't been edited since 2020. it also get the gist of Riepl's law down decently well all things considered.