User:Sohinihalder/Cardiovascular disease in women/LuciaRWest Peer Review

Peer Review
The lead of this article is concise and clear for the reader to follow. The additional information regarding transgender patients provided necessary information that reflects the changing medical landscape. Content added is relevant to the topic and corrects previously incorrect information. New sources have been provided for up-to-date information on the topic. Information is neutral and unbiased. It provides a neutral outlook on cis-gender and trans-gender women with CVD where previously the article focused only on cis-gendered women. Sources and references used in the article have been updated to reflect the most up-to-date information. I noted that the sources used in the article were reliable. Content reflects the information provided by the linked sources. Overall, the article still requires work but the additions and edits that I have reviewed are, in my opinion, strong and helpful to the article as a whole.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sohini Halder and Rafael Lopez.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Cardiovascular disease in women
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)