User:Sokmleopard/Pinus elliottii/Krg0302 Peer Review

General info
Sokmleopard
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Sokmleopard/Pinus elliottii
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Pinus elliottii

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall Impressions

Good, compelling edits that do a good job of contributing to the body of knowledge and fleshing out the management section of the article while tying it back into the life cycle of the disease.

Lead

The first sentence is unnecessary and the overall edit could be more concise but it is overall great additions to the article.

Content

The content is significant and well-written and should be a part of the main article as it provides necessary context and information on the management of fusiform rust.

Tone and Balance

The tone is professional and informative but could be more concise.

Sources and References

Sources are provided alongside adequate citations.

Organization

The edits are organized in a logical manner that builds towards the overall message of managing fusiform until the pathogen hits a "dead-end".

Media

No media was needed or provided.