User:SomaYukihira21X/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Clinical physiology - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) It had something to do with Psychology, I need to complete the training, and my first impression was that the article is not that good.

Evaluate the article

 * No
 * No
 * 1) Yes
 * 2) Concise
 * no
 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * no
 * 1) Yes
 * no
 * no
 * 1) yes
 * no
 * no
 * no
 * no
 * no
 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * 3) yes
 * 4) yes
 * 5) yes
 * no
 * no
 * no
 * 1) no
 * 2) The article is concise, but needs more data backed by adequate sources.
 * 3) Poorly rated
 * 4) Most of the conversation is pointing out flaws rather than asking if they can edit the article or not.
 * 5) The status of the article is average. Has not been edited in over a month.
 * 6) Concise, easy to read, simple, amazing grammar.
 * 7) More information on the importance of clinical physicians, better sources, better paraphrasing, and having a better introductory sentence and lead.
 * 8) Underdeveloped.