User:Somedude who made one argument

(WARNING) this is just an argument that is still in progress information might be changed later on probably on another page.(if anybody reads this)

Humans should not explore space until a further time because it is expensive.For example, in let robots take to the stars, the author states that “Space travel is extremely expensive. To get humans to mars, it would take $1 trillion over a 25 year-period.” (caffall, paragraph 2)This evidence shows that if we do try to at least go try to go to mars it would take up so much money that can be used for more important things.In other words, we should save money for the things that matter and the problems we have on the earth right now.Additionally, according to let robots take to the stars, the author explains that “A mars mission might foster international cooperation, but it would consume funds that could be used for other things” (Caffall, Paragraph 2).This evidence illustrates that we could easily use the money for more important problems that desperately need solutions on our earth .To say it differently, instead of trying to reach the stars and beyond we need to work on the problems on our earth and work until those problems are fixed until we can start thinking about space travel.As can be seen,the expenses of space travel can be used for better purposes on earth and until we can solve those problems on earth will we be valid to start space travel.