User:SonOfTheHoundOfTheSea/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
First Nations nutrition experiments - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose it because it has limited work done on it, and I am interested in the topic, as I learned about first nations experiments in Canada last summer. It matters because it is part of Canada's shameful legacy of unethical treatment of its indigenous population, and it should be a part of the historical record, and more people should be able to read about it in depth. My preliminary impression was that it is very incomplete and seems to be worked on by only a few people.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is the only section, and is about 3 sentences

The content does not cover all important aspects of the topic

The article is from a neutral point of view and the tone is balanced

The sources are not great, a few from a news outlet, and not as many from reliable research papers. One source is an important research article I will be using

There isn't much organization as it is only a few sentencesThere is no talk page

My impression is that there is much to be done, and while it started well, it is so limited that I can't evaluate much about it