User:SonrisasdeSocorro/sandbox

Article Evaluation: ((Buff-breasted buttonquail))


 * distracting info of comparing it to other birds that casual readers may not be familiar with
 * only 2 referenced facts

I'm frustrated by their acceptable references. Because then they seem to be saying that if there's not an article, it's a pipeline problem. (and it is...and it isn't)

My article: Kanaka Maoli Language Revitalization


 * Rated low-quality but high-importance by a WikiProject.
 * WikiProject: Endangered Languages...in "US": Hawaii
 * Not controversial.
 * Topics where you can establish notability with two or more independent, fact-checked and/or peer-reviewed sources
 * UNESCO: http://www.unesco.org/languages-atlas/index.php
 * Corresponding ISO 639-3 code(s)	haw
 * Critically endangered
 * 1000 speakers in 2010
 * http://www.endangeredlanguages.com/lang/125/samples/7156