User:Sophi.cheng/Evaluate an Article

The lead does include an introductory sentence with a brief description and has concise details about the article. The article contents are relevant to the topic about dogs and most of it are up to date and are where it belongs. The point of view is neutral, has an explanation for each type of dogs. Sources and references are mentioned and links that works well. I do feel like some parts of the article could be rearranged as it is a bit confusing. Images and media are all related to the article. On the talking page, there are that mentioned about the sources and how there are a few good sources. Overall, I feel like its at a good place but could use more changes to the source parts. They did a good job with explain and staying on topic. -~

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)