User:Sophi.cheng/Snake/Cara.begley Peer Review

Great use of sources. They seem properly spread throughout. The updated content seems relevant, but I would check the citing on the first source it seems to be a formatted wrong. The new information on snakebites is relevant and was not mentioned before. Antivenom is mentioned a few times, and it could be interesting to go into other methods of treating snake bites. The author also mentions that snakebites are not a widely addressed problem worldwide, and this could constitute some more explanation on the reason why it is not addressed by the medical community.

This author did a great job bringing in viewpoints from all communities, especially with the explanation of the importance of snakes in Asian cuisine and culture. I had not know about this previously, and it was up-to-date and well articulated. This information does not persuade, and includes information about animal rights and the struggle to maintain a balance between culture, consumption, and morals. The author brings in information having to do with overconsumption and ecology which were both great points. There were sources all throughout this paragraph, but I'm not sure if BBC is a reliable source. Might need to check.

Great job! An enjoyable read.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)