User:SophiaFerrizzi2020/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) I am evaluating this article, Alternative therapies for developmental and learning disabilities.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chosen this topic because this topic is very interesting to me and I was hoping to learn something new, as my goal in life if to develop new technologies and medicines that can help mentally disabled people.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introductory paragraph was well write, told what was going to be talked about but not in too much detail. I feel the article did not have much "important" information, and the most recent data being from 2009, it is a bit out of date. The page is organized well with 11 citation for a 7 paragraph page, which is good but there were no pictures and was not very visually appealing. I feel over all the article was well written but was a bit underwhelming and feel it could use more substance and not as repetitive, but I feel this could be in part to the lack of big research studies in this topic. Also Wikipedia signaled that it is need of a situation and the end of the page.