User:Sophiabaylis/Feminist movement/Nchutchi Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sophiabaylis, Ashlie.k.hood, Cahae17, Clmercer9

https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/users/Clmercer9


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Feminist movement - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Feminist movement - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
 Lead 

The Lead has been updated to describe what each peer will be discussing in the work. The Lead does clearly and concisely describe the articles topic in a introductory sentence. The Lead also explains that one peer in the group has not been able to be reached and therefore their section is not included or their contribution. It does have a brief description of the major topics of the feminist movement. The Lead does not cover information that was not included in the article. The Lead is concise and gets right to the point there is not a larger summary of all topics being covered just brief introductions of the sections to follow.

 Content 

The content is relevant to the Feminist Movement and highlights areas such as the history of feminism and social media. The content regarding social media is the most up to date. The political and history section have time dated material that is older. There is content missing from the absent peer of the group but her assigned topic is not disclosed. The article does deal with an underrepresented group and as it relates to feminist struggle over history.

 Tone 

The tone of the work is neutral and there is some bias in the language regarding women's beliefs, but it is not possible to see where those comments were cited from because there are no citations in the entire work. There is a reference section but not listed correctly with citations tying it back to the work.

 Sources and References 

There are no citations in the work in any of the topic sections. There is no way to link any content to the reference list at the bottom of the work. It appears the website links were copied and pasted and are not legible to read or to click on to go to the websites. The citation format on Wiki on the tool tab was not utilized. I'm unable to really know if the sources are current none of the links work or there are no working links available.

 Organization 

The topics could be broken into paragraphs to fully understand rather than one large paragraph for each topic. It appears that the information is jumbled at times. I saw one grammatical area in spacing.

No images were attached to work.

 Overall Impression 

If the work was in a format with paragraphs covering the subtopics it could easily be placed within the article and if the citations were added to the paragraphs of the work so that the links would work in the reference tab.