User:Sophiaschortmann/Snailfish/Finkbr Peer Review

These edits look great! I think I'd continue to cite each sentence where a citation is needed (ex. "This unique snailfish species has transparent, unpigmented skin and scales, thin and incompletely ossified bones, an inflated stomach and a non-closed skull."). I think the content you're adding is useful and new relative to current information available. Most of your collected research is quite accurate, and I'd keep looking for sources in this range. Also, I'd keep an eye out in the future to see if there's a page made for the Okhotsk Snailfish, so a link can be added in the sentence "In the Okhotsk Snailfish (Liparis ochotensis)." When writing, I would avoid using words such as "really interesting," which denotes opinion in your article. Also, the last sentence "The primary prey for this species is fish" leaves me curious for what type of fish the snailfish preys on. I would love to hear more about this if there's more information available. Your sources are mainly current and appropriate to the fish you're studying - however, sources 11 and 12 are duplicates. Your added content was concise and easy to read through, while still being informational. As a few last comments - I'd keep citing every sentence that needs a source, and don't forget to un-bold the text before you post it. Great work!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)