User:Sophiaschortmann/Snailfish/NAM2301 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sophiaschortmann


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Snailfish
 * Snailfish

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I thought the article was well written and detailed. A range of information in terms of taxonomy and morphology was covered, meaning that coherent and flowing writing was important. The debate about how to classify the organism was neutrally presented, enabling a reader to understand both viewpoints and form their own opinions. Furthermore, the information about the morphology organism does an effective job of giving specific information while also addressing inter-species variation. The connection between morphology and behavior also provided beneficial contextualization.