User:Sophiatroia/Co-Cultural Theory/DTrap04 Peer Review

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes the article has 2-3 reliable sources
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The list of sources isn't exhaustive at all and it accurately represents all the info that in the article so far.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? yes it follows Patterns of other articles as it has the same format.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes this articles links to other so it can become more discoverable.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes the content added improved the article quality but since the article isn't finished more info could be added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? the strength of the article is the sources. I think the sources work very well with the Info provided in the article.
 * How can the content added be improved? they need to add a lead and add to the application section of the article.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)