User:SophieVMoon/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Sugar Baby

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It seemed to be somewhat short despite us feeling that there could be a lot to discuss on the subject.

Evaluate the article
I think the lead section is very good. It defines the idea, and sets up some terms that are common within the article.

As far as content, I feel that not all methods of sugaring are mentioned. I think you could do good by mentioning people seeking sugar arrangements on dating apps, tipping and gifting culture around Onlyfans or cam girls, and people that operate as “pay pigs” online.

I think the article does a good job of representing both ends of debates surrounding it, as it has quotes from both sugar babies and a CEO of one of the sugar arrangement websites mentioned.

I did not see any issues with the grammar or language when I was reading through the article.

It does not include any photos or media, but I also don’t really have suggestions for how it could currently.

The article could use some more recent sources, as its most recent is from 2019.

Its talk page is very inactive. Before it was selected for our course it was last updated in July 2020. Most of the discourse on it is asking if it should be moved under a different name. I feel like a good way would be to have the article under “Sugaring” with redirects to it from places like “sugar daddy,” “sugar momma,” or “sugar baby.”

Overall I feel the article has a solid foundation that could be expanded upon and built up in a way that reflects the greater nuance that relationships like this have.