User:Sophie Bazan/Lake Geneva/Snw19 Peer Review

The first thing I would add to this article is links to Wikipedia articles for certain words that readers might not know the definition of. For example the word "tributaries" could have a link or "Dranse" and "Venoge" if they have Wikipedia pages. You have good resources, but you heavily rely on your first and fifth citations. If your other sources don't have enough content to really talk about, I would get more sources. Everything written is relevant and unbiased so that is good. This is a really good start, but I would again add links to better explain words the readers might not know and further talk about your other three resources.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)