User:Sophiepat/Post-mortem chemistry/Dvigna Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sophiepat


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sophiepat/Post-mortem_chemistry?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Post-mortem chemistry

Content
The information you added was certainly relevant to the topic and helps one understand why vitreous humour is sampled. I noticed a small spelling mistake in the paragraph you added, in your first sentence you wrote "thee" instead of "the". You also added a great amount of information, it really adds to the article.

Tone and Balance
The way in which you worded your information is neutral, which is great. Your information does not appear to be biased and does not lean to one viewpoint.

Sources and References
The source you cited for for the information you presented seems like a very good source and is recent, which is great. The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine is a great source and I believe that it is peer reviewed, making it a good choice as source.

Organization
The information about the vitreous humour is well written and concise. It is a great addition to the article. The paragraph under the Post-Mortem Biochemistry heading is a little less well-written. For example, you wrote "...various different types of deaths...", whereas I believe that it would be better to either just write various or different and not both. The remainder of your information is well-organized!

Overall Impressions
I really appreciate the work you put into this article, you added a lot of great information. You also found a great source in order for you to accomplish this. I hope you found my suggestions helpful. Great work!

~ Dvigna