User:Sophiesab/Penny Budoff/Acunangela Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sophiesab


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sophiesab/Penny Budoff


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Penny Budoff

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The information provided has been updated to provide new content. The introductory sentence follows the article conscious. It is not over detailed.

Content:

The content added is up to date. The article deals with female menstrual pain that is an underrepresented topic.

Tone and Balance:

The tone is neutral, there is no bias when reading the article that can shift a person's opinion. The balance is good going over the Dr.'s information.

Sources and References:

The sources link are working well and site the data correctly. The sources are from 2010 and backup the new information provided.

"Dr. Budoff was the first physican to formulate the first vitamins for women" - The source for this would help validate the statement.

Organization:

The article is clear and easy to read.

"Dr. Budoff continued to practice at her heakth center in Long Island for thirty-three years." Grammatical error in last sentence, I assume you meant health. Before final publish it is good to read over.

Overall impressions:

The article feels complete the added information makes the article to read better. The strengths of the article is that the articles are well cited and backup the information provided.