User:Sorcerorswords/sandbox

Inclusion of section about Cat Intelligence was not intended to replace or appear to make claim for the work done by previous author. Clearly, I had written distinctly different section and verbiage based on experience working with cats, rather than scientific observation.

I failed to include four tildes, so along comes a Bot and I am meant to be awash in congratulations for being made to appear as though I attempted o plagiarize a piece of work when I'd clearly written my own subjective material within the document?

And where do I get to explain or vindicate myself for an oversight? An "expert" being considered someone who studies from a distance rather than becoming closely involved with cats and learning. I observed that cats will learn through observation and dislike being "trained". That is a valid personal experience.